So the President (1) identifies with Trevyor Martin, the teenage black boy killed by George`Zimmerman, in self-defense according to the jury, and (2) thinks the not guilty verdict may well have been different if Martin were white.
(It is revealing to note that though Zimmerman is from a multi-racial family like Barack Obama's own, one white one black parent, he is referred/ to as being a white Hispanic. Makes it easier, I guess, to foment the racial divide and hatred the President and the liberal media seem so anxious to promote.)
The President's views contain numerous errors, including the following two gigantic ones:
1. The President's identification with Martin conflicts with his job specifications: it is intended that he represent all of the people, not one segment in preference to another.
2. He besmirches the entire American legal system, including the jury, as being racist without offering one scintilla of proof that his racist views are warranted. I say "the entire American legal system" because he has no way to distinguish the Florida court system and this jury from the rest of the country, nor does he try to do so.
So without proof (aka facts), what does the President have to rely on? Feelings, whims, prejudices. The message the President is sending out to the young black community is as follows:
* Live and act on your preconceived notions, to hell with facts, truth, reality
* Everyone outside our community is out to get you
* If someone is black but doesn't look it, he is not one of us
* You must take justice into your own hands, for it is nowhere else to be found for you
I listed above three error the`President made. But I truly do not believe Obama acted mistakenly. The consistency of his actions and statements in regard to many issues over the past five years strongly suggests that he knew exactly what he was doing, and what he is trying to achieve is crystal clear to him: a broken, divisive, fragmented, vulnerable America.
To how many others is it crystal clear?
No comments:
Post a Comment